Great service from lovely people

Expert advice you can trust

Technology to make translation easier

Great service from lovely people

Expert advice you can trust

Technology to make translation easier

Toller Service von netten Profis

Solide, fachkundige Beratung

Einfache Abläufe dank innovativer Tools

Un service de qualité à visage humain

Expertise, conseil et fiabilité
La technologie au service de la traduction
Servicio excelente de gente encantadora
Asesoramiento experto fiable
Tecnología que facilita la traducción
Servizio eccellente e sempre cordiale
Consigli di esperti fidati e competenti
Tecnologie che semplificano la traduzione
친절한 사람들이 전하는 훌륭한 서비스
신뢰할 수 있는 전문가의 조언
번역을 더 쉽게 만드는 기술

How long does translation take?


Sonja Kirschstein

Operations Director

Ian Gilchrist

PureFluent Roving Reporter

Share this

Tweet Share Share

More content

  • 9 Tips For Increasing E-Learning Engagement

    Read now
  • What are the most popular languages in the world?

    Read now
  • Achieving high-quality translations

    Read now
  • Post-edited machine translation

    Read now
  • Which languages should you translate your website into?

    Read now
  • Translation, localisation, transcreation. Do you know the difference?

    Read now
  • 6 Tips to Help You Pick a Translation Agency

    Read now
  • Is Amazon Translate good enough for my Amazon Listings?

    Read now
  • 5 Tips to Improve Translation ROI

    Read now
  • Top Tips: How to translate your Customer Portal

    Read now

October 3, 2019

In this discussion, we ask the question that everyone wants to know in relation to their translation needs: how long does a translation take?

Ian:Let’s begin this topic by outlining some of the basic timeline parameters, how many translation words per day is realistic?

Sonja:When a human translator is working on a project, we have a time budget in mind of around 2,000 words per day, or about ten pages of A4 text. Some translators are faster, and some are slower so of course there’s variation, but this is a reasonable baseline.

One of the most significant factors that impacts time is the difficulty of the text. If a piece of text is very coherent and flows nicely a translator can get into it and establish a good pace, getting through as much as 2,500 – 3,000 words in a typical working day. If a piece of text is rather disjointed or very terminology heavy, which requires the translator to do quite a bit of research to determine appropriate terms, the productivity rate will be much less, perhaps only 1,000 words in a day.

Ian:How do other things like proof reading have to be factored into a project’s ‘time budget’?

Sonja:The vast majority of our translation projects include and allow for a proofreader’s time. A proofreader generally gets through 4 to 5 times as many words as a translator in the same time period. This ratio is of course affected by the quality of the translation; the proofreader may find herself having to make considerable edits and amendments to the text which will decrease her productivity.

The single largest time requirement from a project management perspective is the time required to put together the best suitable translation team for each project.

As you’ve discussed previously with Tim and Kristin, when the translator finishes her work on a job, the proofreader doesn’t immediately begin her work on the text. There’s almost always a gap between the translator finishing her work and the proofreader beginning hers as they are almost certainly already working on another project. So, while the proofreader can get a lot more done than a translator in a comparable time period, there is a lag between the two.

Ian:Are there any other factors that have an impact on the turnaround time for a translation?

Sonja:There’s a file preparation stage in which we have to get the original content as supplied into a format that enables the translator to access the translation memory and the term base at the start of the project. At the end of the project we have to get the content back in to the original format that it was supplied in, we check that answers to queries have been implemented and go through a final QA check to see if the customer specific terminology has been used and tags and formatting are right. And, of course, check the final document to see if the layout or code adjustments are correct. All this takes time.

The single largest time requirement from a project management perspective is the time required to put together the best suitable translation team for each project. We work regularly with something like 500 translators in a typical month and the assignment process itself can take some time. It can also vary depending on the time of year, as there are fewer translators available during summer and Christmas holidays and everybody else is extremely busy during these dates.

If other services, such as multilingual DTP, are needed then another workflow stage is added to the timeline, as the DTP engineer needs to check that the layout is correct and appropriate for each of the target languages.

Another additional stage can be Client Review, and this can be very time consuming, too, as typically you’re asking someone to review the text who already has the responsibilities of his day job. So, there are a number of things other than the translation and proof reading that have to be considered in the delivery schedule.

Ian:If the base line is 10,000 words translated in a week, barring complications, what options are available if a client requests that a job be completed more quickly than this?

Sonja:The feasibility of getting multiple translators working on the text at the same time is the first thing we’d look at in that circumstance. This is something we do on a fairly regular basis when there’s an urgent need for a particular translation. There are complexities involved in working this way because people obviously will translate the same text in different ways, so you need to employ a robust approach to terminology to ensure that different translators are using the same terminology.

When a customer needs, say, 30,000 words translated within days rather than weeks, that breaks the translation words per day “speed limit”. It’s a request which is almost impossible to fulfil using human translators, so machine translation with human post-editing could be the answer.

A key aspect when using multiple translators is to use one proofreader going through all the work and regimenting any discrepancies in style and terminology. So the proofing person is essentially functioning as an editor. What we want to achieve eventually is that the translation reads like one person wrote it.

It’s much more difficult working this way and there’s always a level of compromise when trying to do a translation very fast with multiple translators – it’s not how to get the very best result but sometimes it’s what we have to do to get the job done.

Ian:How can Translation Memory help with requests for expedited translations?

Sonja:What may start as a 10,000 words translation may actually end up being only a 5,000 word ‘new’ translation based on Translation Memory matches from previous translations and repeated text within the document. Translation Memory can play a critical role in transforming what may look at first sight like an impossible job into something which is very doable.

Terminology is key, too; when you’re working at speed having a robust terminology process really helps with getting the job done very quickly without compromising on quality.

About the authors

Sonja Kirschstein

In her role as Operations Director at Purefluent, Sonja looks after project quality, customized workflow solutions as well as our relationship with our suppliers.

Coming from a professional translator’s background, with a short diversion into teaching, she looks back to over 25 years of experience in the language industry. Her grasp of international business and cultural identity has been built up through her time working and living in the UK, Spain, France and Germany.

See all posts by Sonja Kirschstein
Ian Gilchrist

Ian has worked in music and home entertainment product development, marketing, and journalism in the U.S., Canada and the UK, where he currently lives, for over 30 years.

In that time he's has aided and abetted an eclectic array of artists including Alison Krauss, Talking Heads, Madeleine Peyroux and Slade, and has worked for a diverse range of labels and companies including Universal Music (Canada), Pioneer LDC (Europe), Milan Records (France), the British Film Institute (BFI), Rounder Records Group (Canada) and BMG (UK). In his guise as a film journalist Ian's interviewed many renowned and influential people, including director John Carpenter (Halloween), actors Jesse Eisenberg (The Social Network) and Tom Hardy (Venom), director Roman Polanski (Chinatown), and many more.

See all posts by Ian Gilchrist

Share this

Tweet Share Share